We could eventually utilise cookies and may need access to some of your browser settings. Click the following button if you agree with our data protection terms according to EU regulation 2016/679 (GDPR). We never ask nor store any of your personal data when using our website in a regular way.

Details >

    

Hebrew or Greek ?
About the differences of two cultures
                      
Hebrew or Greek ?
    Dark Mode
This text is taken entirely and with the friendly approval from the Ancient Hebrew Research Center.


In the world, past and present, there are two major types of cultures; the Hebrew (or eastern) culture and the Greek (or western) culture. Both of these cultures view their surroundings, lives, and purpose in ways which would seem foreign to the other. With the exception of a few Bedouin nomadic tribes living in the Near East today, the ancient Hebrew culture has disappeared.

What happened to this ancient Hebrew thought and culture? Around 800 BCE, a new culture arose to the north. This new culture began to view the world very much differently than the Hebrews. This culture was the Greeks. Around 200 BCE the Greeks began to move south causing a coming together of the Greek and Hebrew culture. This was a very tumultuous time as the two vastly different cultures collided. Over the following 400 years the battle raged until finally the Greek culture won and virtually eliminated all trace of the ancient Hebrew culture. The Greek culture then in turn influenced all following cultures including the Roman and European cultures, our own American culture and even the modern Hebrew culture in Israel today.

As 20th Century Americans with a strong Greek thought influence, we read the Hebrew Bible as if a 20th Century American had written it. In order to understand the ancient Hebrew culture in which the Tenack (Old Testament) was written in, we must examine some of the differences between Hebrew and Greek thoughts.

Abstract vs. concrete thought

Greek thoughts view the world through the mind (abstract thought). Ancient Hebrew thoughts view the world through the senses (concrete thought).

Concrete thought is the expression of concepts and ideas in ways that can be seen, touched, smelled, tasted and/or heard. All five the senses are used when speaking, hearing, writing and reading the Hebrew language. An example can be found in Psalm 1:3; "He is like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season, and whose leaf does not wither". In this passage we have concrete words expressing abstract thoughts, such as a tree (one who is upright, righteous), streams of water (grace), fruit (good character) and a unwithered leaf (prosperity).

Abstract thought is the expression of concepts and ideas in ways that can not be seen, touched, smelled, tasted or heard. Ancient Hebrew never uses abstract thought like the English language for example does. Examples of Abstract thought can be found in Psalm 103:8; "The LORD is compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in love". We mentioned that ancient Hebrew uses concrete and not abstract thoughts, but here we have abstract concepts like 'compassionate', 'gracious', 'anger', and 'love' in an originally Hebrew written passage. Actually, these are abstract English words translating the original Hebrew concrete words. The translators often translate them this way, because the original Hebrew words make no sense when literally translated into English.

Let us take one of the abstract words above to demonstrate how this works. Anger, an abstract word, is actually the Hebrew word (awph), which literally means "nose", a concrete word. When one is very angry, a person begins to breath heavy and his nostrils begin to flare. A Hebrew literally 'sees' anger as a flaring of the nose (nostrils). If a translator would translate the above passage into "slow to nose", it would of course make no sense to an English reader, so , a nose, is translated into "anger" in this passage.

Appearance vs. Functional Description

Greek thoughts describe objects in relation to it's appearance. Hebrew thoughts describe objects in relation to it's function.

A deer and an oak are two very different objects, and we would never describe them in the same way with our Greek form of descriptions. The Hebrew word for both of these objects is (ayil). Because the functional description of these two objects deer and oak are identical in ancient Hebrew, the same Hebrew word is used for both. The actual Hebraic definition of this word is "a strong leader".

A deer stag is one of the most powerful animals of the forest, and is seen as "a strong leader" among the other animals. Also, the oak tree's wood is very strong compared to other trees such as the pine, which is soft. Therefore, the oak is considered to be a "strong leader" among the trees of the forest.

Notice the two distinct translations of the one Hebrew word in Psalm 29.9. The NASB and KJV translate it as "The voice of the LORD makes the deer to calve", while the NIV translates it as "The voice of the LORD twists the oaks". The literal translation of this verse in Hebrew would be however: "The voice of the LORD makes even strong leaders turn".

When translating the Hebrew into English, the translator must give a Greek description to a Hebrew word, which is why we have two different ways here of translating one verse. This same word is also translated as a "ruler" in 2 Kings 24.15, who is a man who is a strong leader.

Another example of Greek thought would be the following description of a common pencil: "it is yellow and about 8 inches long". A Hebrew description of the pencil would be related to its function, such as "I write words with it". Notice that the Hebrew description uses the verb "write", while the Greek description uses the adjectives "yellow" and "long". Because of Hebrew's functional descriptions, verbs are used much more frequently then adjectives.

Impersonal vs. Personal Description

The Greek culture describes an object in relation to the object itself. The Hebrew culture describes an object in relation to the Hebrew person himself.

As in the above example with the pencil, a Greek description portrays the pencil's relationship to itself by using the word "is". Ancient Hebrew describes the pencil in relation to the person himself by stating "I write". Because Hebrew does not describe objects in relation to themselves, the ancient Hebrew vocabulary does not have - and need - the verb 'be'.

A Greek description of God would be "God is love", which describes God in relation to God. A Hebrew description would be "God loves me", describing God in relationship to oneself.

Passive vs. Active Nouns

Greek nouns are words which refer to a person, place, or thing. Hebrew nouns refer to the action of a person, place, or thing.

The Hebrews are active people and their vocabulary reflects this lifestyle. The Greek culture recognizes the words such as 'knee' and 'gift' as nouns which by themselves impart no action. But in the Hebrew vocabulary the nouns come from the same root word because they are related; not in appearance, but in action. The Hebrew word for knee is (berak) and literally means "the part of the body that bends". The Hebrew word for a gift is (berakah), meaning "what is brought with a bent knee". The verb from the root word is (barak), meaning "to bend the knee". As you can see, both Hebrew verbs and nouns have action associated with them, whereas the Greek nouns do not.

Even the Hebrew nouns for father and mother are descriptive actions. The Hebrew word for father is (av) and literally means "the one who gives strength to the family", and mother (em) means "the one that binds the family together".


This text was ENTIRELY taken with the friendly approval from a great explanatory website of the Ancient Hebrew Research Center at the following link:

https://www.ancient-hebrew.org/philosophy/ancient-hebrew-thought.htm







Leave a comment:



Send


                      


For tips and confidential information: send us your fully encrypted message at news@sun24.news by using our public PGP encryption key (online tool here).








Recommended:

An urgently needed Pope change

About pervert attitudes and productive dialogues

We are saying 'Merry Christmas' again

An according to Pope Francis only wall building 'un-christ', talking about the protection of religion

A new way of becoming a celebrity

About how Pope Francis turned into an American Football fan

An image full of wonders

About stars, missing pigments, and digital 1600 pixel per square millimeter zooms

A Deafening Silence

About an expressive quietness of Pope Francis

Disgraceful

About the connection between Pope Francis and George Soros

A tragic bishop from Munich

About A.I. and the church social romantics

What Pope-Posters from Rome teach us

About left-liberal church elites and their biased media

Pilgrimage to Jerusalem

A short story on ecumenism



Rate this article
    
Thanks !
or leave a comment
Send